Dear Sebastian,
Thank you for the advice!
On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 20:08:23 +0200
Sebastian Meyer <seb.me...@fau.de> wrote:
> I think a workaround that currently works for your use case is to use
> \code{fooval.\var{m}} as the label (i.e., wrapped inside \code).
The workaround works well, but I think I agree that \item{fooval.<m>}{}
is the the better option here. (I'm tempted, but I shouldn't use
\item{\code{fooval.\var{<m>}}}, because \code{} arguments should be
syntactically valid R.)
I will also use \var{<m>} outside the \item headers, at least for now.
--
Best regards,
Ivan
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
