On 1/23/23 17:51, Ying Li via R-package-devel wrote:
Dear all,
Hope you are well! Recently, in the check before a re-submission, I got an unexpected note
when doing R CMD Check using rhub::check_for_cran(), saying that "Examples with CPU
(user + system) or elapsed time > 5s".
I didn't expect this note to appear because the same examples didn't cause this
note in the previous submission last December. Compared with the previous
submission, we only edited documentation, there was no change in the R code for
functions of our package.
To double-check, I downloaded our previous submission from CRAN and checked it
again. It's strange that this current CRAN version also has this note now.
However, when submitting it last December, there were no such notes. Do you
have any idea why the R CMD Check results are inconsistent?
You could check on Winbuilder as that is a concrete setup used for
incoming checks. But in principle, the computation may take longer
because of changes in dependencies, external software and R. Which can
be due to a performance regression, a bugfix, etc. Only
debugging/profiling could reveal the true cause.
Since the examples caused no note in the last submission and were successfully
submitted to CRAN, I'm not sure whether I should change the examples in this
re-submission to eliminate this sudden note. Any suggestions will be
appreciated!
If you were close to the limit last time, it may be a coincidence and
you might simply reduce the examples to be on the safe side.
Tomas
Thank you!
Ying
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
