* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE Maintainer: ‘Aisouda Hoshiyar <aisouda.hoshi...@hsu-hh.de>’
is just a change of the maintainer and already declared in my cran-comments.md file. Best Aisouda > Am 17.08.2021 um 15:42 schrieb Gábor Csárdi <csardi.ga...@gmail.com>: > > I think they are this: > > * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE > ... > > and this: > > * checking examples ... [76s/77s] NOTE > Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 5s > user system elapsed > ordPens-package 54.112 0.044 54.158 > ordPCA 18.377 0.004 18.382 > > G. > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 3:38 PM Aisouda Hoshiyar > <aisouda.hoshi...@hsu-hh.de <mailto:aisouda.hoshi...@hsu-hh.de>> wrote: >> >> The CRAN (pretest) email states: >> >> package ordPens_1.0.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks >> automatically, please see the following pre-tests: >> Debian: >> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log >> >> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log> >> >> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log >> >> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log>>> >> Status: 2 NOTEs >> >> Last released version's CRAN status: NOTE: 13 >> See: <https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html >> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html> >> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html >> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html>>> >> >> Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform. >> If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please >> reply-all to this message and explain. >> >> I really don’t understand how else to fix (and what to fix). These are out >> of date problems of version 0.3-1, which are not relevant any more in >> version 1.0.0 >> Version 1.0.0 exactly was a fix to those. >> >> Do you think I can reply-all & explain that this must be a false-positive? >> >> Best >> Aisouda >> >> >> >>> Am 17.08.2021 um 15:22 schrieb Georgi Boshnakov >>> <georgi.boshna...@manchester.ac.uk >>> <mailto:georgi.boshna...@manchester.ac.uk>>: >>> >>> When the previous version has problems, you get an email listing them, >>> followed with something like 'Did you fix them? Please Reply-All...' >>> >>> Maybe you missed the last phrase? >>> >>> Georgi Boshnakov >>> >>> >>> >>> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>> >>> From: R-package-devel <r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org >>> <mailto:r-package-devel-boun...@r-project.org>> on behalf of Aisouda >>> Hoshiyar <aisouda.hoshi...@hsu-hh.de <mailto:aisouda.hoshi...@hsu-hh.de>> >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 12:59:13 PM >>> To: r-package-devel@r-project.org <mailto:r-package-devel@r-project.org> >>> <r-package-devel@r-project.org <mailto:r-package-devel@r-project.org>> >>> Subject: [R-pkg-devel] submitting package update failed, since old version >>> out of date (?) >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> submitting an update of our package ordPens failed (update version is >>> 1.0.0), reporting the following: >>> Version: 1.0.0 >>> ok >>> Version: 0.3-1 >>> Check: R code for possible problems, Result: NOTE >>> genRidge: no visible global function definition for 'plogis' >>> ordGene: no visible global function definition for 'anova' >>> ordGene: no visible global function definition for 'lm' >>> ordSelect: no visible binding for global variable 'sd' >>> ordSmooth: no visible binding for global variable 'sd' >>> plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'grey' >>> plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'devAskNewPage' >>> plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'lines' >>> predict.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'plogis' >>> Undefined global functions or variables: >>> anova devAskNewPage grey lines lm plogis sd >>> Consider adding >>> importFrom("grDevices", "devAskNewPage", "grey") >>> importFrom("graphics", "lines") >>> importFrom("stats", "anova", "lm", "plogis", "sd") >>> to your NAMESPACE file. >>> Version: 0.3-1 >>> Check: package dependencies, Result: NOTE >>> Package suggested but not available for checking: ‘IsoGene’ >>> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html >>> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html> >>> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html >>> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html>> >>> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html >>> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html> >>> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html >>> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html>>> >>> >>> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/ >>> >>> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/><https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/ >>> >>> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/>> >>> >>> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/ >>> >>> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/><https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/ >>> >>> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/>>> >>> >>> But these are exactly the new changes that we already took care of in the >>> updated version 1.0.0 >>> The previous version 0.3-1 is from 2015 and due to R updates, the old >>> package won’t work any more. >>> That is exactly the reason for update version 1.0.0, were everything is >>> fixed now. >>> >>> Also, >>> - there is a NOTE about change in maintainer, which is already stated in >>> the cran-comments.md, and the previous maintainer sent an e-main to CRAN as >>> well >>> - there is a NOTE saying 'Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time >>> > 10s‘ >>> which is also stated in the cran-comments.md explaining that >>> cross-validation examples are important for illustrating the package usage. >>> >>> >>> So is this a false positive? >>> >>> Best >>> Aisouda >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>> >>> ______________________________________________ >>> R-package-devel@r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org> >>> mailing list >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >>> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel> >>> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >>> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>> >> >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-package-devel@r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org> mailing >> list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
