Wondering about etiquette/if I should start over again with a package
submission. tl;dr, the package has been 'waiting' since 30 July (I
responded the same day to the queries that were sent).
For what it's worth, the 'pretest-waiting-recheck' message below was
sent from *a* CRAN maintainer, but hitting "reply-all" in my mail client
only included the "cran-submissi...@-rproject.org" address. Maybe my
mail client is misconfigured → supposed to respond to the sender as well
as the Reply-To: address? I could poke the individual CM who sent it
personally, but I'm loath to do that unnecessarily ...
thoughts?
Ben Bolker
---
(Some previous history omitted here for brevity; there had been a bit of
back-and-forth about this package previously.)
07/30: Submitted version 1.1.2.2 of the glmmTMB package. Got a
"pretest-waiting-recheck" message asking us to confirm that we had
addressed issues; I responded the same day.
08/04, 08/06: Tried to confirm that the message was received (maybe I
was too pushy?) -- no answer that I have seen.
The CRAN queue in general seems to be moving OK
(foghorn::cran_incoming(), 'archive' folder filtered out, sorted by
time: 57 total, 45 from today or yesterday).
package version cran_folder time
<chr> <pckg_vrs> <chr> <dttm>
1 BIRDS 0.2.1 pending 2021-07-21 17:01:00
2 glmmTMB 1.1.2.2 waiting 2021-07-30 20:29:00
3 PEcAn.logger 1.8.0 waiting 2021-08-05 18:58:00
4 IPDFileCheck 0.7.4 waiting 2021-08-06 11:15:00
5 R6 2.5.1 waiting 2021-08-06 22:27:00
6 ibdreg 0.3.3 pending 2021-08-06 23:41:00
7 mark 0.2.0 waiting 2021-08-08 23:25:00
8 DataGraph 1.2.3 pending 2021-08-09 03:11:00
9 tibble 3.1.4 waiting 2021-08-09 05:46:00
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
