I think the problem with RPostgreSQL/sec/RS-DBI.c comes from some changes to Defn.h and Rinternals.h in RHOME/include that Luke made recently (2021-07-20, svn 80647). Since then the line #define s_object SEXPREC in Rdefines.h causes problems. Should it now be 'struct SEXPREC'?
-Bill On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 7:04 AM Iñaki Ucar <iu...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 15:51, Hannah Owens <hannah.ow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > I am working on an update to a package I have on CRAN called occCite. My > > latest release attempt didn’t pass incoming automated checks, because > there > > is an outstanding error. Additionally, there are some weird notes I would > > like to get rid of, if anyone has suggestions. > > > > The killing error is in r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, which is: > Packages > > required but not available: 'BIEN', 'taxize', ‘RPostgreSQL' > > > > I don’t understand this, as it is the only system that throws this error, > > and the packages mentioned are available via CRAN. Any suggestions? > > This kind of message usually arises when there is some problem with > those packages on CRAN. Indeed, > > https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_BIEN.html > https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_taxize.html > https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_RPostgreSQL.html > > the three of them have ERRORs in that platform. No issue on your end. > You reply pointing to that. > > > Additionally, there are multiple platforms > > (r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang; r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc; > > r-devel-windows-x86_64-gcc10-UCRT; r-patched-solaris-x86; > > r-release-macos-arm64; r-release-macos-x86_64; r-oldrel-macos-x86_64) > where > > two notes pop up: > > > > NOTE 1: Namespace in Imports field not imported from: ‘bit64’ All > declared > > Imports should be used. > > > > The package does use bit64. Any tips on how to address this note? > > Are you sure? Your NAMESPACE file does not import(bit64) nor > importFrom(bit64,) anything. > > > NOTE 2: Found 6 marked UTF-8 strings. > > > > I presume this is thrown because of the small sample dataset I’ve > included > > in the package, but why is it not thrown for all the platforms? > > Not all the checks are necessarily done in all the platforms. You can > silence this NOTE by converting the offending strings in your datasets > to ASCII and resaving them. > > -- > Iñaki Úcar > > ______________________________________________ > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel