For "obvious" reasons? I don't see this kind of avoidance as "obviously"
correct at all. You have a dependency... it should be declared. There are
various ways to proceed, with Imports or Depends or Suggests or pulling the
code into your package... but trying to subvert the dependency management is
counterproductive.
On December 16, 2020 8:28:15 AM PST, Colin Gillespie <csgilles...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm planning on using the tools::R_user_dir function in a package. But
>for obvious reasons, I don't want to set the dependency on R 4.
>
>My code is basically
>
>if (as.numeric(R.version$major) < 4) # do something
>else tools::R_user_dir("oysteR", which = "cache")
>
>When checking on win-builder R3.6 I get the note
>
>* checking dependencies in R code ... NOTE
>Missing or unexported object: 'tools::R_user_dir'
>
>## Question
>
>Is my code correct and can I ignore this note?
>
>Thanks
>
>Colin
>
>
>Dr Colin Gillespie
>http://www.mas.ncl.ac.uk/~ncsg3/
>
>______________________________________________
>R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
