On 10/12/20 6:36 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 12/10/2020 6:14 p.m., Ben Bolker wrote:
I'd say a mismatch in saved output isn't a small problem, it's either a
too-sensitive test or something serious.
Duncan Murdoch
That's fair enough, but it would be nice if (1) this were a NOTE and
I don't think so. As I said, I think it should be marked as an ERROR.
OK. But it would probably be wise (if the CRAN maintainers actually
wanted to do this) to crank it up from silent -> NOTE -> WARNING ->
ERROR over the course of several releases so as not to have widespread
test failures on CRAN right away ...
Duncan Murdoch
(2) it were made explicit in the CRAN policy that, *except by special
exception*, an unresolved NOTE is grounds for rejection. This is
broadly understood by experienced package maintainers but must sometimes
come as a shock to newbies ...
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
