Dear List-Members:
The email from the automatic incoming checks says to "reply-all" in case
one suspects a false-positive, yet the reply-to header is set only to "
[email protected]". My email program (just as myself)
interprets this as "reply-all means replying only to
[email protected]". The wording in the email, on the other
hand, suggests I also should reply to Uwe Ligges. I find the current
disagreement of wording and email headers more than confusing.
Can someone clarify the correct protocol of replying to the email? I
wouldn't want to unnecessarily bother Uwe Ligges with even more emails.
Thanks,
David
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
