The reason that your package does not pass the incoming checks is
> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
> Maintainer: ‘Cristian Quiroz-Moreno <cristianquirozd1...@gmail.com>’
>
> Uses the superseded package: ‘snow’
You would need to explain to CRAN why you need to use "snow" rather than
base R's "parallel" package. But I guess you should actually replace
"snow" by "parallel" in your package.
Cheers,
Sebastian
Am 24.03.20 um 17:50 schrieb Daniel Quiroz Moreno:
> Dear community,
>
> I have an issue with the current version of my package. The current CRAN
> version is 1.1.0 when it was submitted, I had no warnings. These days I
> fixed an issue and I would like to submit a minor version 1.1-1. I have no
> errors or warnings in the local check.
>
> Even though, when I submit to CRAN, it does not pass the automatic check.
> The mail does not show any error or warning for the newest version (1.1-1)
> but it points to a warning for the current version (1.1.0). I have
> corrected this warning in the newest version but it does not pass the CRAN
> check.
>
> Please, can you help me how to fix this? I mean, how to avoid the current
> CRAN version warnings, instead of the newest version?
>
> If you would like to see the logs, I paste the mail.
>
>
> package RGCxGC_1.1-1.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
> automatically, please see the following pre-tests:
> Windows: <
> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/RGCxGC_1.1-1_20200320_181616/Windows/00check.log
>>
> Status: 2 NOTEs
> Debian: <
> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/RGCxGC_1.1-1_20200320_181616/Debian/00check.log
>>
> Status: 1 NOTE
>
> Last released version's CRAN status: WARN: 2, NOTE: 6, OK: 5
> See: <https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/checks/check_results_RGCxGC.html>
>
> Last released version's additional issues:
> donttest <https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/donttest/RGCxGC.out>
>
> CRAN Web: <https://cran.r-project.org/package=RGCxGC>
>
> Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.
> If you are not sure how to fix the problems shown, please ask for help on
> the R-package-devel mailing list:
> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>
> If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please
> reply-all to this message and explain.
>
> More details are given in the directory:
> <
> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/RGCxGC_1.1-1_20200320_181616/
>>
> The files will be removed after roughly 7 days.
>
> No strong reverse dependencies to be checked.
>
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
