We've noticed over the past week that Winbuilder/R-Hub's 'experimental' Rtools4 toolchain images for Windows are approximately 4-5x slower than all other containers to build and check several packages we maintain.
This affects everything, including example timings, where this architecture is the only architecture that shows any example run-times over 5 seconds. (including Windows under the older toolchain). Does CRAN expect us to optimize our code for the clearly non-performant 'experimental' Windows toolchain? I'd like to send a new version of our package PerformanceAnalytics to CRAN, but the Windows experimental toolchain is preventing a 100% clean set of checks. Regards, Brian -- Brian G. Peterson ph: +1.773.459.4973 im: bgpbraverock ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel