> Why are you against the futures and all the new shiny things? ;-) Sometimes one does not have control over these things, still using R 3.2 on some systems! ;o
On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 5:43 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 14 July 2019 at 17:06, Travers Ching wrote: > | For maximum compatibility in a package, personally I would use version 2. > > Why are you against the futures and all the new shiny things? ;-) > > Duncan put it well in his follow-up message. We might as well use this as a > nudge towards upgrading to current versions. > > But if one really felt that one had to, one could always branch and provide > both old and new rds versions. > > Dirk > > -- > http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
