Thank you for the the insights, Gabor and Hugh! Line 186 happens to be a
\begin{itemize} in the package documentation section (which is chock-full
of links), I didn't change that, but I did expand the DESCRIPTION, so I
guess it makes sense that one of those links have slid down and gotten
stuck between the pages.Now if only I had a reliable way of reproducing the error -_- Thank you both for the quick responses! Zhian On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 4:00 PM Hugh Parsonage <hugh.parson...@gmail.com> wrote: > Unfortunately this error is caused by a hyperlink straddling a page, so > it’s difficult to solve uniformly. > > The LaTeX error message provides a clue as to where the hyperlink might be > (near an \item near a \code) but no exact location. > > My advice would be to look where you have hyperlinks (including cross > references) in your documentation and either reword the documentation or > omit hyperlinks until you can produce a full pdf manual. Then, examine > where the hyperlink might have straddled two pages and more surgically > reword that paragraph/list to enable the original intent to be typeset. > > The hyperlink may also occur in a bibliography where you may have to make > more drastic omissions or additions in order for compilation to succeed. > > On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 12:37 am, Zhian Kamvar <zkam...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm having a really strange problem that I cannot reproduce locally >> (Ubuntu >> bionic) or on Rhub. I've run into an issue where the R package manual is >> failing only on this platform with ancient LaTeX runes that I struggle to >> decipher [0] >> >> > * checking PDF version of manual ... WARNING >> > LaTeX errors when creating PDF version. >> > This typically indicates Rd problems. >> > LaTeX errors found: >> > ! pdfTeX error (ext4): \pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level >> than \pd >> > fstartlink. >> > \AtBegShi@Output ...ipout \box \AtBeginShipoutBox >> > \fi \fi >> > l.186 \item \code >> > ! ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced! >> > * checking PDF version of manual without hyperrefs or index ... OK >> > * checking for non-standard things in the check directory ... NOTE >> > Found the following files/directories: >> > ‘poppr-manual.tex’ >> > >> > >> The only information I could find on the error was a question with answers >> that were more questions: https://stackoverflow.com/q/2765229/2752888 >> >> Uwe Ligges was kind enough to trigger a second build to see if this was an >> anomaly, but the same incantation appeared again. I've tried building this >> on Rhub debian-devel-gcc, but could not reproduce the error [1] and no >> other platform does this. >> >> Has anyone seen this before? >> >> Thanks, >> Zhian >> >> [0]: >> >> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/poppr_2.8.3_20190618_151346/Debian/00check.log >> [1]: >> >> https://builder.r-hub.io/status/original/poppr_2.8.3.tar.gz-130d92cdeb2c4c46b94d8cc13b8921b9 >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
