I think the current best practice is to wrap the Fortran code in a C helper, and invoke that using .Call - more information on that is available in Hadley's book - http://adv-r.had.co.nz/C-interface.html
It shouldn't be too much work, maybe another 10-20 lines of code, most of which could probably autogenerated using Rcpp if you wanted to take that route. On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 6:31 AM Berry Boessenkool < berryboessenk...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Recently, users of my package rdwd have provided Fortran code for a nice > extension of the package. > According to the following site, calling .Fortran() is no longer > recommended: > https://github.com/wrathematics/Romp/blob/master/README.md#fortran > > Since this is my first time using native code, I'd highly appreciate any > thoughts on the following question: > How much additional work should I put into avoiding .Fortran() for > long-term CRAN suitability? > > Thanks ahead, > Berry > > PS: In case you want a look at the (two very short) Fortran routines: > https://github.com/brry/rdwd/tree/master/src > and their call in R: > https://github.com/brry/rdwd/blob/master/R/readRadarFile.R#L119 > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel