On 03/05/2019 10:02 a.m., Jarrett Phillips wrote:
Hello,


I have run devtools::check_built() on my package tarball to ensure the
presence of no ERRORS/WARNINGS or NOTES. The below WARNING was found:

That appears to be similar to this bug, which has been fixed in R-devel:

https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17558

That fix only handled the case of an example using data() with the package argument set to an expression, not a constant string. Does one of your examples do that? Other possible functions which haven't been fixed are "library", "require", "loadNamespace", "requireNamespace". If you use one of those in an unusual way, that might be the cause.

If that doesn't help, I'd be willing to take a look at the tarball to see if I can spot what's going on.

Duncan Murdoch

W  checking for unstated dependencies in examples ...

    Warning: parse error in file 'HACSim-Ex.R':

    197:17: unexpected symbol

    196: # user prompted to select appropriate FASTA file of

    197: aligned/trimmed DNA

                                             ^


My documentation doesn't run up to line 197. All documentation is below 100
lines in length.


Prior to a small fix (changing \dontrun to \donttest), my package had zero
WARNINGS, ERRORS and NOTES.


The WARNING seems to stem from the 'DNA' reference within the comment.


Is the above WARNING a false positive?


i recently updated to R 3.5.3, could this have caused this issue?



Thanks!



Cheers,


Jarrett

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Reply via email to