Dear Duncan,
Thank you very much for your email. That worked fine!
-Tolis.
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 15:41, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 18/02/2019 6:08 a.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote:
> > I am developing a Rcpp package in order to make a submission to CRAN. I
> use
> > modules for 4 C++ classes. I have used the prompt function (`prompt(yada,
> > "yada-module.Rd")`) using the names of my modules, in order to document
> the
> > exposed classes. But I still get a warning when I perform the check using
> > devtools library (devtools::check(cran=TRUE) ). The check returns that
> > there is not a documentation for the exposed classes:
> >
> > checking for missing documentation entries ... WARNING
> > Undocumented S4 classes:
> > ‘Rcpp_Hpolytope’ ‘Rcpp_Zonotope’ ‘Rcpp_Vpolytope’ ‘Rcpp_IntVP’
> > All user-level objects in a package (including S4 classes and methods)
> > should have documentation entries.
> > See chapter ‘Writing R documentation files’ in the ‘Writing R
> > Extensions’ manual.
> >
> >
> > Do you know a proper way to document a module without getting a warning?
>
> You should be using promptClass() or promptMethods() instead of prompt()
> for classes and methods respectively. Don't throw away what you've
> done: just use promptClass() into a different location, and copy your
> text into the appropriate places in it. In particular, you'll likely
> need a \docType{class} line, a long list of aliases, and maybe some
> special sections documenting the slots, inheritance, etc.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
>
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
