On 18 January 2019 at 15:13, Rolf Turner wrote:
|
| Thanks Dirk. Your suggestion worked perfectly. (See inline below.)
Glad to hear.
| On 1/18/19 2:50 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 18 January 2019 at 11:59, Rolf Turner wrote:
[...]
| > Which of these packages uses Rcpp Modules? Yours? brms::brm()
|
| Definitely brms:brm()!!! Using Rcpp is far beyond my limited capabilities.
|
| > It may be more prudent replace
| >
| > importFrom("Rcpp","cpp_object_initializer")
| >
| > with
| >
| > import(Rcpp)
| >
| > which tickles a different initialization for Rcpp. I just checked two Rcpp
| > Modules using packages of mine, and they use that latter approach.
|
| Yep. Tried that, and it works. It all seems like sorcery to me, but I
| guess if I (or somebody more clever than I, e.g. your very good self)
| can get it to work, then that's all that matters.
Something is off the rocker here as you should not have to do anything here
besides importing brms::brm. That another package uses Rcpp should not force
you to do something so I suspect something else is amiss. But based on the
information given I can not think of a suggestion. As they say: Oh well ...
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
