I made some updates and ran a couple of additional checks, e.g., R CMD check --as-cran, win-builder, AppVeyor, Travis. Everything is giving me status OK. However, when I try to resubmit my package, I get another ERROR running examples for arch 'i386': https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/180107_170932_DataExplorer_050/00check.log
Is there a difference in configuration for the "incoming_pretest" check? And is there a way to re-produce this error other than trying to release it? Apologies if I am missing something obvious, and thank you! Best, Boxuan (Bo) On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Uwe Ligges <lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de> wrote: > > > On 06.01.2018 18:36, Boxuan Cui wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> *[Issue 1]* >> >> This is the first time I have encountered this, and I have no idea what's >> going on. I really appreciate anyone's help on this. >> >> My package: https://cran.r-project.org/package=DataExplorer >> >> My story: >> >> - *[Jan 01]* >> - I plan to release the latest version to CRAN. I ran all checks >> (including win-builder through *devtools::build_win()*) on my >> package, everything is OK, so I submitted it. >> - The URL for win-builder has expired, but in case you can find the >> check log: https://win-builder.r-project.org/D52z9NcU7633 >> - AppVeyor build log: >> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/boxuancui/dataexplorer/ >> build/master.36 >> - Travis CI build log: >> https://travis-ci.org/boxuancui/DataExplorer/builds/323730230 >> - *[Jan 03]* >> - I was told that I need to update my MIT license file, since I >> made >> some changes there. I did as told and re-submit the package. I >> didn't >> change anything. >> - *[Jan 03 (later of the day)]* >> - My package is failing example checks on arch 'i386' for Windows, >> according to >> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ >> 180103_161227_DataExplorer_050/00check.log >> - Note the example was failing for *split_columns()*. >> - *[Jan 05]* >> - I saw the Email and did another *devtools::build_win()* with no >> changes at all. >> - I received the same error, but on another function, i.e., >> *set_missing()*. >> - The check log is here: >> https://win-builder.r-project.org/9bKr71mwef11/00check.log >> - *[Jan 05]* >> - After some investigation, I believe it is due to dependency >> versions, so I update DESCRIPTION with latest version for all, >> including R >> (was 3.3.0). >> > > > No, not the reason: You checked with R-devel, hence the version > requirement is not the reason for the problems you reported above. > > - This time the check log is showing a warning: *checking >> DESCRIPTION >> meta-information ... WARNING Dependence on R version '3.4.3' not >> with >> patchlevel 0*. >> - The check log is here: >> https://win-builder.r-project.org/5Px18P21h44a/00check.log >> >> Has anyone encountered this issue before? >> > > > In order to get consistent binary repositories etc., we ask you to find > proper vresion requirement with patchlevel 0, i.e. 3.3.0 or 3.4.0 if > applicable. > > > Best, > Uwe Ligges > > > > *[Issue 2]* >> >> Does anyone know how to remove these warnings for vignettes? >> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_DataExplorer.html >> They happen on the following systems: >> >> - r-patched-solaris-x86 >> - r-release-osx-x86_64 >> - r-oldrel-osx-x86_64 >> >> Warning message: >> >> *Warning in engine$weave(file, quiet = quiet, encoding = enc) :* >> * Pandoc (>= 1.12.3) and/or pandoc-citeproc not available. Falling >> back >> to R Markdown v1.* >> * Warning in normalizePath(f2) :* >> * path[1]="./webshot3eaf50bf136e.png": No such file or directory* >> * Warning in file(con, "rb") :* >> * cannot open file './webshot3eaf50bf136e.png': No such file or >> directory* >> * Quitting from lines 57-68 (dataexplorer-intro.Rmd) * >> * Error: processing vignette 'dataexplorer-intro.Rmd' failed with >> diagnostics:* >> * cannot open the connection* >> * Execution halted * >> >> >> After searching for the same warnings online, I found that vignettes (from >> other pakcages) that loads JavaScript files tend to have these. Is there a >> way to fix this? >> >> >> Thank you very much for your time! >> >> >> Best, >> Boxuan (Bo) >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
