These are not check errors, but indeed a bug in the check tool: https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/c063350799e2209afe1c5b23915ee7b9a1606652#diff-4882a8c8e173bda109ed98da485e1428R8640
It has been fixed, so next R-devel build should be fine. Gabor On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:04 AM, brodie gaslam via R-package-devel <r-package-devel@r-project.org> wrote: > ______________________________________________ > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: brodie gaslam <brodie.gas...@yahoo.com> > To: List R-package-devel <r-package-devel@r-project.org> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 01:54:04 +0000 (UTC) > Subject: RE: CRAN check FAIL due to pragmas in headers and code > I too am seeing the same failure in my package. It does not contain any > #pragma directives, and it doesn't have any dependencies to other compiled > packages. > Poking around through the CRAN checks I've found other packages with C > compiled code displaying the same error on the clang and gcc 64 bit debian > checks: > * diffobj: (my package) > https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang/diffobj-00check.html* > xts: > https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang/xts-00check.html* > backports: > https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang/backports-00check.html > I'm pretty sure (but not certain) that my package did not throw these errors > as of quite recently (I uploaded to CRAN over the weekend). > > This leads me to think that it is (maybe) possible that this is an issue with > the latest version of the check tool? > Best, > Brodie. > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
