On 05.12.2017 18:35, Iñaki Úcar wrote:
2017-12-05 10:04 GMT+01:00 Jose Manuel Vera <vera.joseman...@gmail.com>:
Hi all
Submitted my package to CRAN but I got some notes I cannot understand.
First NOTE is regarding possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION. Taken
into account that these are not mispelled words (catastro is a spanish word
for "Property registry office") I leave it for now.
catastro (18:64)
kml (18:39)
spanish (12:70, 17:37)
You can ignore this if they are false positives. However, you may
consider using \emph{catastro},
No, not in Title nor Description fields.
with italics, given that it's a
Spanish word. Also "spanish" should be "Spanish", and I suppose "kml"
is KML, the markup language.
The rest of notes are the ones I cannot understand. All tests are ok.
Examples are running Ok. Tests raised no error, all seems ok but i get
this:
** running examples for arch 'i386' ... [36s] NOTE
Examples with CPU or elapsed time > 10s
user system elapsed
cadastral_references 0.58 0.16 17.75
geocode_cadastral 0.11 0.00 16.61
** running examples for arch 'x64' ... [37s] NOTE
Examples with CPU or elapsed time > 10s
user system elapsed
cadastral_references 0.69 0.15 17.24
geocode_cadastral 0.13 0.03 17.73
This means that your examples are taking too much time to run. You
should explain this in your submission, or you may consider
simplifying your examples a little bit to get shorter run times. Also
you may use \dontrun{} to avoid running a specially heavy example.
Ideally use toy examples so that they can be executed quickly. not only
preferabble for CRAN but also for your users to be able to quickly see
what is going on ...
Best,
Uwe Ligges
Iñaki
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
