It's Rcpp 0.12.12 and R 3.4.1. If nobody can reproduce this with Windows
7 (?), I'll assume it's something odd with my system.
Thanks
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Uwe Ligges <lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de
> wrote:
>
>
> On 28.08.2017 18:10, Peter Clifford [peter.cliff...@stats.ox.ac.uk]
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 28 August 2017 at 10:21, Peter Clifford [
>>> peter.cliff...@stats.ox.ac.uk]
>>> wrote:
>>> | R version 3.4.0 and 3.4.1 with Rcpp 0.12.12 Windows 7.
>>>
>>> Potentially wrong list here as it is an Rcpp question...
>>>
>>> | Trying to fix persistent "Found no calls to: 'R_registerRoutines',
>>> | 'R_useDynamicSymbols'" problem, when running Rcmd check --as-cran.
>>> |
>>> | Eventually gave up with my own package and tried the simplest possible
>>> case
>>> | using Rcpp.package.skeleton("test") with defaults, i.e. the hello_world
>>> | example.
>>> | That works fine with Rcmd build test and Rcmd check test_1.0.tar.gz,
>>> but
>>> if
>>> | I try Rcmd check --as-cran test_1.0.tar.gz I get the NOTE:
>>> |
>>> | File 'test/libs/x64/test.dll':
>>> | Found no calls to: 'R_registerRoutines', 'R_useDynamicSymbols'
>>> |
>>> | It is good practice to register native routines and to disable symbol
>>> | search.
>>> |
>>> | I don't whether there really is a registration problem and if there is,
>>> how
>>> | to fix it.
>>> |
>>> | I'd be grateful for suggestions. Thanks.
>>>
>>> I cannot reproduce this. Full log below -- new package, and running
>>> compileAttributes() creates the registration as it should.
>>>
>>> (For all the R Core members in the audience: We still need pre-build /
>>> post-build hooks like cleanup to have R CMD foo do more things. Happy to
>>> work
>>> on that if somewhat can work with me to shepherd this in ...)
>>>
>>> Dirk
>>>
>>>
>>> edd@bud:/tmp$ r -e 'Rcpp::Rcpp.package.skeleton("barePackage")'
>>> Creating directories ...
>>> Creating DESCRIPTION ...
>>> Creating NAMESPACE ...
>>> Creating Read-and-delete-me ...
>>> Saving functions and data ...
>>> Making help files ...
>>> Done.
>>> Further steps are described in './barePackage/Read-and-delete-me'.
>>>
>>> Adding Rcpp settings
>>> >> added Imports: Rcpp
>>> >> added LinkingTo: Rcpp
>>> >> added useDynLib directive to NAMESPACE
>>> >> added importFrom(Rcpp, evalCpp) directive to NAMESPACE
>>> >> added example src file using Rcpp attributes
>>> >> added Rd file for rcpp_hello_world
>>> >> compiled Rcpp attributes
>>> edd@bud:/tmp$
>>> edd@bud:/tmp$ build.r barePackagePlus/ # simple littler wrapper
>>> * checking for file ‘barePackagePlus/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK
>>> * preparing ‘barePackagePlus’:
>>> * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
>>> * cleaning src
>>> * installing the package to process help pages
>>> * saving partial Rd database
>>> * cleaning src
>>> * checking for LF line-endings in source and make files
>>> * checking for empty or unneeded directories
>>> * building ‘barePackagePlus_1.0.tar.gz’
>>>
>>> edd@bud:/tmp$
>>> edd@bud:/tmp$ RD CMD check --as-cran barePackage_1.0.tar.gz
>>> * using log directory ‘/tmp/barePackage.Rcheck’
>>> * using R Under development (unstable) (2017-08-24 r73125)
>>> * using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
>>> * using session charset: UTF-8
>>> * using option ‘--as-cran’
>>> * checking for file ‘barePackage/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK
>>> * checking extension type ... Package
>>> * this is package ‘barePackage’ version ‘1.0’
>>> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
>>> Maintainer: ‘Your Name <y...@email.com>’
>>>
>>> New submission
>>> * checking package namespace information ... OK
>>> * checking package dependencies ... OK
>>> * checking if this is a source package ... OK
>>> * checking if there is a namespace ... OK
>>> * checking for executable files ... OK
>>> * checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
>>> * checking for portable file names ... OK
>>> * checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
>>> * checking whether package ‘barePackage’ can be installed ... OK
>>> * checking installed package size ... OK
>>> * checking package directory ... OK
>>> * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
>>> * checking top-level files ... OK
>>> * checking for left-over files ... OK
>>> * checking index information ... OK
>>> * checking package subdirectories ... OK
>>> * checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
>>> * checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
>>> * checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
>>> * checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ...
>>> OK
>>> * checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
>>> * checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies
>>> ... OK
>>> * checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
>>> * checking loading without being on the library search path ... OK
>>> * checking use of S3 registration ... OK
>>> * checking dependencies in R code ... OK
>>> * checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
>>> * checking replacement functions ... OK
>>> * checking foreign function calls ... OK
>>> * checking R code for possible problems ... OK
>>> * checking Rd files ... OK
>>> * checking Rd metadata ... OK
>>> * checking Rd line widths ... OK
>>> * checking Rd cross-references ... OK
>>> * checking for missing documentation entries ... OK
>>> * checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK
>>> * checking Rd \usage sections ... OK
>>> * checking Rd contents ... OK
>>> * checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK
>>> * checking line endings in C/C++/Fortran sources/headers ... OK
>>> * checking compiled code ... OK
>>> * checking examples ... OK
>>> * checking PDF version of manual ... OK
>>> * DONE
>>>
>>> Status: 1 NOTE
>>> See
>>> ‘/tmp/barePackage.Rcheck/00check.log’
>>> for details.
>>>
>>>
>>> edd@bud:/tmp$
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>> Apologies Dirk, I should have emphasized that this is on Windows 7. I
>> tried it on a Linux box later with no problem. I sent it to this list
>> because I thought it might be a general problem for package development in
>> Windows.
>>
>
>
> Could it be your Windows installation contains an outdated version of Rcpp?
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
>
>> Thanks
>>
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>
>>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
