Hi Max,
Thank you for your reply and feedback. As an aside, I recently released a
package which also adopted the new \doi{} macro, and it seems to have
passed CRANs tests and is now available. So, I suspect it's not related to
this inherently macro, though perhaps you are right it could be related to
a missing dependency. What, exactly, I'm not sure, and tracking it down
seems nearly impossible at the moment....
Phil
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:13 PM, MTurgeon <maxime.turg...@mail.mcgill.ca>
wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> As you said yourself, if you can't reproduce the message locally, it will
> be difficult to fix. But maybe the following will help: I looked at your
> Github repository, Tand it seems the only changes that were made to your
> files in the man/ directory since your successful release of mirtCAR 1.5 to
> CRAN is the doi's that you added. In particular, you're using the macro
> \doi. As explained in WRE (https://cran.r-project.org/do
> c/manuals/r-devel/R-exts.html#User_002ddefined-macros), since R 3.2.0
> users can define their own Latex-like macros to be used in the
> documentation files. I don't know how to fix your error, but I would look
> into that first. Maybe it's a matter of a missing dependency (e.g. one of
> the base packages), maybe you need to add an extra file to your package
> when you use macros. But it still doesn't explain why the error doesn't
> appear on all/most platforms...
>
> Hope my comments help,
>
> Max
>
>
>
> On 2017-07-25 02:42 PM, Phil Chalmers wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> First time posting here, so hopefully I'm following the correct etiquette.
>>
>> I recently received the error:
>>
>> "Package has help file(s) containing build-stage \Sexpr{} expressions but
>> no 'build/partial.rdb' file."
>>
>> when submitting a package to CRAN (source code: https://github.com/
>> philchalmers/mirtCAT). However, I'm having difficulty reproducing the
>> exact
>> problem on my Windows and Linux computers with the latest R dev version
>> (2017-07-25 r72968). Moreover, I don't really understand the issue, as I
>> do
>> not use \Sexpr{} anywhere in the package.
>>
>> After a quick search, I found a link on SO (https://stackoverflow.com/
>> questions/32357637/two-note-messages-from-r-cmd-check-as-cran), but it
>> does
>> not appear too helpful as far as I can tell (I don't explicitly use
>> \package_____() commands anywhere). Can anyone shed some light on this
>> warning and my difficulty in reproducing the message? Thank you in
>> advance.
>>
>> Phil
>>
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Maxime Turgeon, PhD candidate
>
> Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health
> McGill University
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
