>>>>> Fox, John <j...@mcmaster.ca>
>>>>> on Mon, 16 Jan 2017 15:44:05 +0000 writes:
> Dear Martin,
> Thanks for addressing this question, if belatedly!
> After a little bit of thought, perhaps a default somewhere between 1 and
Inf makes sense, along with an additional argument to citation:
citation(package="pkg", bibtex.max=n), with default bibtex.max=
getOption("citation.bibtex.max"), where the citation.bibtex.max option is
initially set to something like 4. If the number of available citations exceeds
bibtex.max, then a message like "there are additional BiBTeX citations, enter
'citation(package="pkg", bibtex.max=Inf)' to see all of them."
In the mean time, I have always used my proposed change.
I think any number between 1 and Inf is so much arbitrary that
inspite of your good thoughts I kept the *new* default at Inf.
and because of this open question, I have forgotten to commit
the change to the development version of R !
I have done so now, however not ported it yet to "R 3.4.0 alpha".
If not much surfaces (in CRAN / Bioc checks), we may port it in
time for 3.4.0.
Martin
> Best,
> John
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Martin Maechler [mailto:maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch]
>> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 10:02 AM
>> To: Fox, John <j...@mcmaster.ca>
>> Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
>> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] multiple bibentry()s in CITATION
>>
>> >>>>> Fox, John <j...@mcmaster.ca>
>> >>>>> on Fri, 2 Sep 2016 15:42:46 +0000 writes:
>>
>> (which is more than 4 months ago)
>>
>> > Dear list members,
>> > I've noticed that citation(package="pkg") generates both a text
>> citation and a BiBTeX entry when the CITATION file contains a single
>> call to bibentry() or citEntry(), but that only text citations are shown
>> if there are multiple calls to bibentry() or citEntry().
>>
>> > Is this behaviour intentional? In my opinion, it's useful always
>> to show the BiBTeX (although it's available through
>> toBibtex(citation(package="pkg")) ).
>>
>> > The Writing R Extensions manual says, "A CITATION file will
>> contain *calls* [my emphasis] to function bibentry."
>>
>> > Thanks,
>> > John
>>
>> and you did not get a reply....
>> I had wanted but forgotten about it ... two parts :
>>
>> 1) On November 24, 2012, I had improved R with an option to get this
>> so this has been a "hidden gem" ;-) for a while in R:
>>
>> > options(citation.bibtex.max = Inf)
>> > citation(package = "Rcmdr")
>>
>> To cite the 'Rcmdr' package in publications use:
>>
>> Fox, J., and Bouchet-Valat, M. (2017). Rcmdr: R Commander. R package
>> version 2.3-2.
>>
>> A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
>>
>> @Manual{,
>> title = {{Rcmdr: R Commander}},
>> author = {John Fox and Milan Bouchet-Valat},
>> year = {2017},
>> note = {R package version 2.3-2},
>> url = {http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Misc/Rcmdr/},
>> }
>>
>> Fox, J. (2017). Using the R Commander: A Point-and-Click Interface or
>> R. Boca Raton FL:
>> Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
>>
>> A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
>>
>> @Book{,
>> title = {Using the {R Commander}: A Point-and-Click Interface for
>> {R}},
>> author = {John Fox},
>> year = {2017},
>> publisher = {Chapman and Hall/CRC Press},
>> address = {Boca Raton {FL}},
>> url = {http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/RCommander/},
>> }
>>
>> Fox, J. (2005). The R Commander: A Basic Statistics Graphical User
>> Interface to R.
>> Journal of Statistical Software, 14(9): 1--42.
>>
>> A BibTeX entry for LaTeX users is
>>
>> @Article{,
>> title = {The {R} {C}ommander: A Basic Statistics Graphical User
>> Interface to {R}},
>> author = {John Fox},
>> year = {2005},
>> journal = {Journal of Statistical Software},
>> volume = {14},
>> number = {9},
>> pages = {1--42},
>> url = {http://www.jstatsoft.org/v14/i09},
>> }
>>
>> >
>> ----------------
>>
>> This all works "obviously" (;-) via utils:::format.bibentry () and even
>> when I had made the number one an argument to that function with a
>> default you can set via options(), I had wondered a bit why the cutoff
>> should by default be at one.
>>
>> E.g., it looks strange that by *adding* a 2nd reference, you get shorter
>> citation output.... and to me it would seem more coherent to have the
>> default rather be 'Inf' instead of '1', i.e. always showing both text
>> and bibtex.
>>
>> There is quite a difference though: For our copula package, e.g.,
>>
>> > options(citation.bibtex.max = 1); citation(package = "copula")
>>
>> To cite the R package copula in publications use:
>>
>> Marius Hofert, Ivan Kojadinovic, Martin Maechler and Jun Yan (2017).
>> copula:
>> Multivariate Dependence with Copulas. R package version 0.999-16 URL
>> https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=copula
>>
>> Jun Yan (2007). Enjoy the Joy of Copulas: With a Package copula.
>> Journal of Statistical
>> Software, 21(4), 1-21. URLhttp://www.jstatsoft.org/v21/i04/.
>>
>> Ivan Kojadinovic, Jun Yan (2010). Modeling Multivariate Distributions
>> with Continuous
>> Margins Using the copula R Package. Journal of Statistical Software,
>> 34(9), 1-20. URL
>> http://www.jstatsoft.org/v34/i09/.
>>
>> Marius Hofert, Martin Maechler (2011). Nested Archimedean Copulas Meet
>> R: The nacopula
>> Package. Journal of Statistical Software, 39(9), 1-20. URL
>> http://www.jstatsoft.org/v39/i09/.
>>
>> >
>>
>> This is relatively compact (18 lines)
>> whereas it gives 67 lines of output when the option is set to something
>> >= 4.
>>
>> Other opinions?
>> What do you think, would it be worth the compatibility break to change
>> the default from '1' to 'Inf' ?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Martin
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
