Thanks Boris, My main concern I suppose is if this mailing list is appropriate to occasionally solicit additional testers. Just curious what people (i.e. Admins) would think about using the list for such a purpose.
Regards, Charles On Friday, February 5, 2016, Boris Steipe <boris.ste...@utoronto.ca> wrote: > Of course I can speak only for myself, but I'd help out if asked and I > think in general you'll find people here to be a pretty helpful bunch. > > Cheers, > Boris > > > On Feb 5, 2016, at 8:30 AM, Charles Determan <cdeterma...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > I'm not sure if this question is appropriate for the R mailing lists but > > I'm not sure where else to ask. > > > > I am wondering if there is any means by which package authors can solicit > > testers for a package. I believe this is often referred to as 'crowd > > sourced testing'. > > > > I am aware of continuous integration platforms and unit testing (e.g. > > testthat) but that only gets me so far. In my particular instance I am > > developing packages for GPU computing (maybe this request would be best > on > > the HPC mailing list?). As such, I can't possibly have access to every > > type of GPU. I would like to find a means of 'recruiting' users who may > > have different pieces of hardware to test my package. Of course this > won't > > be exhaustive but any additional testing that others could provide would > > make the package all the more stable. > > > > Regards, > > Charles > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > > ______________________________________________ > > R-package-devel@r-project.org <javascript:;> mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
