On 21/06/2015 9:12 PM, Gábor Csárdi wrote: > On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Duncan Murdoch > <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> wrote: > [...] >> >> But it's trivial to source files from the tests directory. > > It is actually often not trivial at all. E.g. if you have a test with > setup/teardown, and the setup must be run before each test case, the > teardown after, and you want to run each test case in a clean > environment, this really does not play well with source-ing files. > > It is definitely possible, and probably works for smaller packages > with simple tests, but imo it is not good practice. > >> Or perhaps >> (I don't know, I don't use it) it's trivial to tell travis to run the >> standard R CMD check, followed by the suggested one. > > Yes, it is trivial, but I think this is not good practice either. E.g. > testthat gives you a summary in the end, and then you would need to > look at multiple summaries. It is easy to forget about the multiple > summaries, and miss one. > > I think it is way easier if you just invoke the testing once, and let > it select what to run based on where it is running, what services are > available, etc.
As long as the reports tell you what tests were skipped, this seems reasonable too. Duncan Murdoch ______________________________________________ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel