Hi, In the help file for str(), the following line appears: "no.list logical; if true, no ‘list of ...’ nor the class are printed". However, that appears to be true only on the top level; setting no.list to TRUE still leaves the remaining levels with the `list of ...' statement intact:
> x <- list( + a = list(list()), + b = list(list()) + ); > str(x) List of 2 $ a:List of 1 ..$ : list() $ b:List of 1 ..$ : list() > str(x, no.list = TRUE) $ a:List of 1 ..$ : list() $ b:List of 1 ..$ : list() > For readability reasons, I'd like to keep the indented $ signs and the names of the sub-lists but suppress printing of `List of ...'. Is that possible? Thanks, Jeff -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/str-how-to-use-no-list-recursively-tp1820073p1820073.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
