On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Roger DeAngelis(xlr82sas) <rdean...@amgen.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > You are absolutely correct about 32/64 and it appears to be a severe > penalty. But I think 32 to 32(win/unix) does not incur the penalty. There > are even more issues between mainframe and unix/windows. The 32 to 64 is a > big hit when querying data dictionaries that have a mixture of 32/64 bit SAS > objects. > > As a side note, I could reload the R workspace between batch submissions to > maintain consistent environments. > > I do support quite a few statisticians and I try to get them to think more > in terms of R especially those that use IML, but unlike Frank I feel there > are several areas where SAS is the more logical solution. I think SAS(9.22) > is a little ahead of R in SVG graphics(the future) and graphic editors and > unlike Frank I don't think R and LaTex is more powerful than ods/tagsets and > SAS reporting/graph procedures. Imbeding graphic objects inside proc report > is powerful, see > > http://homepage.mac.com/magdelina/.Public/met_may_103.rtf
This seems quite comparable: library(meta) example(forest) ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
