Your welcome, I wanted to say I agree with Bruno that the comparative software is very expensive, even more prohibitively so for students and even though MPlus is good I think R will catch up rapidly and even overtake those as people who use these modeling techniques become more integrated into the R community.
Joe King 206-913-2912 j...@joepking.com "Never throughout history has a man who lived a life of ease left a name worth remembering." --Theodore Roosevelt -----Original Message----- From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Reeyarn_???_10928113 Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 6:27 PM To: R-help@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] Is SEM package of R suitable for sem analysis Dear Bruno and Joe, Thanks for advising! Reeyarn On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Bruno Falissard <falissar...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > A few years ago it could have been true, but now the package has improved > (especially with the bootstrap procedure). > At the moment there is no argument to recommend AMOS. On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Joe King <j...@joepking.com> wrote: > I am going to take SEM this next quarter in my doctoral program. My > suggestion is to use the program your professor suggests and try to > re-create your models in R using the SEM package. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
