On Nov 2, 2009, at 10:40 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:


 with the following simple data frame
dd = structure(list(z = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L
), .Label = c("a", "b"), class = "factor"), x = c(0.3, 0.2, 0.1,
0, 0, 0, 0.2, 0.3)), .Names = c("z", "x"), row.names = c(NA,
-8L), class = "data.frame")

 I would like know if it's possible to use model.matrix()
to construct the following design matrix in some sensible way:

 za zb
1  1  0
2  1  0
3  1  0
4  0  0
5  0  0
6  0  0
7  0  1
8  0  1

 In other words, I want column 1 to be (z=="a" & x>0) and
column 2 to be (z=="b" & x>0).  I can construct this matrix
using

sweep(model.matrix(~z-1,dd),1,dd$x>0,"*")

and then stick it into lm.fit -- but is there a more
elegant way to do this in general?

Elegance? You decide. But at least more economical from a keystroke perspective:

model.matrix(~z-1,dd)*(dd$x>0)
#------
  za zb
1  1  0
2  1  0
3  1  0
4  0  0
5  0  0
6  0  0
7  0  1
8  0  1
attr(,"assign")
[1] 1 1
attr(,"contrasts")
attr(,"contrasts")$z
[1] "contr.treatment


I haven't found a formula combining
(z-1) and I(x>0) that works, although I can imagine there is one.

thanks
 Ben Bolker



David Winsemius, MD
Heritage Laboratories
West Hartford, CT

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to