Hello,
We are a group of PhD students working in the field of toxicology. Several
of us have small data sets with N=10-15. Our research is mainly about the
association between an exposure and an effect, so preferrably we would like
to use linear regression models. However, most of the time our data do not
fulfill the model assumptions for linear models ( no normality of y-varible
achieved even after log transformation). We have been told that we can use
bootstrapping to derive a confidence interval for the original parameter
estimate ( Beta 1) from the linear regression model and if the confidence
interval do not include 0, we can "trust" the result from the original
linear model ( of couse only if a scatter plot of the variables looks ok).
What is your opinion about this method? Is that ok? I have problems
understanding how it is possible to resample several times from an already
poor distribution ( that do not fulfill the model assumptions for linear
models) to achieve a confidence interval that "validates" the use of these
linear models? I would really appriciate a simple explanation about this!
Many thanks,
Charlotta Rylander
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
