Thanks. The points of having the column of matrices (all the same dimension)
in a data.frame, is that there are also other data, each matrix is at
a location, so there are geographical
coordinates and possibly other measurements at the same location.
Kjetil
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Barry Rowlingson
<b.rowling...@lancaster.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Kjetil Halvorsen
> <kjetilbrinchmannhalvor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hola!
>>
>> I am working on a problem where data points are (square) matrices. Is
>> there a way to make a
>> "vector" of matrices, such that it can be stored in a data.frame? Can
>> that be done with S3?
>> or do I have to learn S4 objects & methods?
>>
>
> If the matrices are all the same size then you could store them in an
> array, which is essentially a 3 or more dimensional matrix.
>
> Otherwise, you can store them in a list, and get them by number:
>
> foo = list(matrix(1:9,3,3),matrix(1:16,4,4))
> foo[[1]]
> foo[[2]]
>
> and so forth.
>
> You'll only need to create new object classes (with S3 or S4) if you
> want special behaviour of vectors of these things (such as plot(foo)
> doing something sensible).
>
> With S3 it's easy:
>
> class(foo)="squareMatrixVector"
>
> plot.squareMatrixVector=function(x,y,...){
> cat("ouch\n")
> }
>
> plot(foo)
> ouch
>
> Barry
>
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
