Hi Murat,
I am not an expert in either statistics nor R, but I can imagine that
since the default is exact=TRUE, It numerically computes the
probability, and it may indeed be 0. if you use wilcox.test(x, y,
exact=FALSE) it will give you a normal aproximation, which will most
likely be different from zero.
Hope this helps.
Keo.
Murat Tasan escribió:
hi, folks,
how have you gone about reporting a p-value from a test when the
returned value from a test (in this case a rank-sum test) is
numerically equal to 0 according to the machine?
the next lowest value greater than zero that is distinct from zero on
the machine is likely algorithm-dependent (the algorithm of the test
itself), but without knowing the explicit steps of the algorithm
implementation, it is difficult to provide any non-zero value. i
initially thought to look at .mach...@double.xmin, but i'm not
comfortable with reporting p < .mach...@double.xmin, since without
knowing the specifics of the implementation, this may not be true!
to be clear, if i have data x, and i run the following line, the
returned value is TRUE.
wilcox.test(x)$p.value == 0
thanks for any help on this!
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
