Fortune candidate?
cheers,
Rolf Turner
On 30/08/2009 6:08 PM, Noah Silverman wrote:
<snip>
Normally, I would just write a huge "for each" loop, but have read
that
is hugely inefficient with R.
On 31/08/2009, at 10:47 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Don't believe what you read, try it. If the for loop takes 100 times
longer than the fastest method, but it still only takes 10 seconds, is
it worth optimizing?
######################################################################
Attention:\ This e-mail message is privileged and confid...{{dropped:9}}
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
