On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Jeff Xu wrote:


Hi Lars,

Using the definition of Likelihood-ratio test is straightforward,


To which I would add, following the instructions in the _posting guide_ is equally straightforward. viz


        help.search("loglikelihood")

takes you to

        ?stats::logLik

Chuck


Jeff

Lars Bergemann wrote:


Hi.



I would like to use a likelihood-ratio test to compare a linear model
(lm()) to another linear model containing the first one to see if the
extra factors are needed - but I was unable to find any help on how to do
that.

Could you help me and tell me what to do? Or tell me where to find help on
this topic?



Many thanks in advance!



Lars

_________________________________________________________________

s. It's easy!

aspx&mkt=en-us
        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.



--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-perform-a-Likelihood-ratio-test--tp24460221p24463269.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Charles C. Berry                            (858) 534-2098
                                            Dept of Family/Preventive Medicine
E mailto:cbe...@tajo.ucsd.edu               UC San Diego
http://famprevmed.ucsd.edu/faculty/cberry/  La Jolla, San Diego 92093-0901

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to