Ken Knoblauch wrote:
>
> Ben Bolker <bolker <at> ufl.edu> writes:
>> >> > Here is a toy example that illustrates the overshoot of the formula
>> >> > \documentclass[12pt]{article}
>> >> > \usepackage{geometry}
>> >> > \geometry{left=2in,right=2in}
>> >> > \begin{document}
>> >> > <<keep.source=TRUE>>=
>> >> > op <- options(width = 65, digits = 3)
>> >> > ddataframe <- data.frame(AAAAA = 1:10,
>> >> > BBBBB = factor(letters[1:2]),
>> >> > CCCCC = factor(LETTERS[1:5]),
>> >> > SSSSS = factor(paste("S", 1:10, sep = "")),
>> >> > RRRRR = rnorm(10))
>> >> >
>> >> > mod1 <- lm(RRRRR ~ AAAAA + BBBBB + CCCCC + SSSSS,
>> >> > ddataframe)
>> >> > summary(mod1)
>> >> > @
>> >> > \end{document}
>> >> A quick guess: try keep.source=TRUE and format your commands
>> >> as you would like to see them appear ...
>> >> Ben Bolker
>> > Thanks, Ben, for the response.
>
> --- deleted text ---
>
>>
>> I wonder if there is a LaTeX-side solution, i.e. constructing a
>> verbatim-like environment that breaks lines?
>
> It sounds a bit like an oxymoron but isn't that
> more or less what Sweave does when keep.source is
> not set to TRUE, only it doesn't seem to catch the
> print-outs of these long calls. I'll give your
> suggestion some further thought, however.
> Thanks.
>
> Ken
>
>
I don't think so. What happens is that R's parser breaks
up the lines, and then the verbatim environment respects
whatever line-breaking it has done. There are environments
like alltt that do variants (although alltt is not what we need
here).
Ben
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/overshoot-of-formula-line-in-summary-output-of-Sweave-tp24053269p24111467.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
