I think I am using the improved version of setdiff(...) that handles data.frames, so I think some odd behavior was expected but this one is escaping me.
It appears that the the addition of duplicate entries is not caught by the setdiff(...). Is this expected behavior? If so, is there another method or approach that should be used to identify duplicate row entries between two different data frames? Thanks in advance for any feedback. Test1_DF<-data.frame(HouseSize=c(1:100)) Test2_DF<-rbind(Test1_DF, Test1_DF) setdiff(Test1_DF, Test2_DF) integer(0) setdiff(Test2_DF, Test1_DF) integer(0) However, Test3_DF<-data.frame(HouseSize=c(1:25)) setdiff(Test1_DF, Test3_DF) [1] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 [17] 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 [33] 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 [49] 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 [65] 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 setdiff(Test3_DF, Test1_DF) integer(0) ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
