Hello Stephen,
I can confirm that I get the same behavior in my Windows machine. Here
is a summary:
> memory.limit()
[1] 2046
> memory.limit(2092)
Error in trunc(.Internal(memory.size(size))) :
Non-numeric argument to mathematical function
> memory.limit()
[1] 2092
As you described, the function reports an error but it indeed modified
the memory allocation limit. This must be somehow related to the
modification to memory.limit() described in the release notes for
Windows R version 2.9.0
(http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/CHANGES.R-2.9.0)
> version
_
platform i386-pc-mingw32
arch i386
os mingw32
system i386, mingw32
status
major 2
minor 9.0
year 2009
month 04
day 17
svn rev 48333
language R
version.string R version 2.9.0 (2009-04-17)
All: is this a bug or are we missing something?
Regards,
Francisco
__
Francisco J. Zagmutt
Vose Consulting
2891 20th Street
Boulder, CO, 80304
USA
franci...@voseconsulting.com
www.voseconsulting.com
Derek Stephen Elmerick wrote:
I ran the memory limit function in R 2.9.0 and received the 'error'
below. The memory appears to update correctly, so there's probably no
implication beyond cosmetic; however, thought I would make sure since the
function as written did not generate the same error in my 2.8.0 version of
R.
Thanks
memory.limit(size=4095)
Error in trunc(.Internal(memory.size(size))) :
Non-numeric argument to mathematical function
memory.limit()
[1] 4095
<r-help@r-project.org>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
