Thomas Lumley wrote: > On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote: > >> >> thanks for the explanation. for the sake of rvalues, please do not fix >> this bug. i find it useful to avoid messing with = and <-. >> > > If you insist on calling it a bug, the chances of its getting fixed > are higher.
no no, it's *NOT* a b(...)! vQ ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
