Hi: I think I saw a link where the author clarified the original article
and explained more clearly that the design of R had it roots in S/S+. I
don't
remember where I saw it but it's somewhere. Also, I think it's jumping
the gun to claim that anyone lied to anyone before doing the research
and
knowing that FOR SURE but that's just my opinion and you are entitled
to yours.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Robert Wilkins wrote:
It does look like Gentleman and Ihaka not only lied to the New York
Times, but also to the New Zealand Herald and who knows who else. This
is disgusting. The R programming language is the S programming
language, and Gentleman and Ihaka are not the ones who designed it.
http://thenewyorktimesissloppy.blogspot.com/
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
