Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
Hey, everybody.
I am concluding that this Sweave wrecks quotation marks in typewriter
font is a bug in Sweave.
No. It's generic to the ae package. Try this:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{ae}
\begin{document}
\noindent
\texttt{``double quotes''}\\
\texttt{"double quotes"}\\
\texttt{`single quotes'}\\
\texttt{`{}`double single quotes'{}'}\\
\end{document}
Basically, TeX is trying to use symbols which are not present in the AE
fonts. Sweave uses the ae package by default, which may or may not be a
good idea (AE fonts tend to behave somewhat better than Computer Modern
bitmaps in PDF files).
Looks like the aecompl package removes the problem too, i.e.
\usepackage{aecompl}
\usepackage[noae]{Sweave}
Apparently, you do need the noae bit even if you load aecompl after Sweave.
I've uploaded the foo.tex file so now you can see the Rnw, tex, and
pdf file side by side.
http://pj.freefaculty.org/latex
As previous poster noted, the Sweave instruction is added at the end
of the preamble in foo.tex. However, moving the \usepackage{Sweave} to
the beginning of the preamble has no effect. Same black boxes.
It is true that one can work around this by inserting the declaration
\usepackage[noae]Sweave
into the Rnw file (or in the tex file). That solves the problem,
however, the user is left with a suspicious feeling. What will go
wrong in my output after [noae] is inserted? If nothing, why was it
there in the first place?
pj
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Øster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalga...@biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
