> As for jit and Ra, that was immediate reaction too but I found that jit does > not help on your example. But I concur fully with what Ben said --- use the > tool that is appropriate for the task at hand. If your task is running for > loops, Matlab does it faster and you have Matlab, well then you should by all > means use Matlab.
A good chunk of statistical computation involves loops. We are all happy R users. I was surprised to see that we are so far from matlab in the crucial dimension of performance. -- Ajay Shah http://www.mayin.org/ajayshah ajays...@mayin.org http://ajayshahblog.blogspot.com <*(:-? - wizard who doesn't know the answer. ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
