--- Begin Message ---
Apologies -- you are being more subtle than I thought.  Nevertheless, I think 
that the censoring language isn't quite right.

  You are thinking of a hierarchical model:
  
    z ~ N(Xb, sigma), where Xb is the linear predictor, whatever covariates you 
think belong in the model.  Whether the distribution should be Gaussian or 
somthing else depends not on the overall distribution of z, but on distribution 
of (z | Xb).  We could have a skewed predictor leading to skewed z, even if the 
distribution about any given expectation is symmetric.
    
    y = F(z) is what you observe.  The classic tobin model is y= max(0,z), 
which 
does lead to censored data. 
    
    In your case y_i = Binomial(n_i, p_i = H(z)).  Note a binomial is k heads 
out of n tries with a coin of probability p, a "Bernouli" is a binomial 
restricted to a single coin flip.  From the way you wrote the problem I assumed 
that there is some number of n "looks" at the subject and then you count them 
up.  Note that var(y) = n p (1-p)
    
    H describes how the probability changes with z.  In biology we very rarely 
use H(z)= max(min(z,1),0) because it gives a hard threshold, and the 
probability 
of nearly anything doesn't go all the way to zero or one.  
    
    If H were as above and 
        var(y) = constant and
        n is sufficiently large so that Binomial dist is approx Gaussian and
        var(y |p) << var(z| Xb)

then your y will fit a censored Gaussian.  Since at least the second is false, 
it doesn't.  

   A censored model may still be an ok first cut at fitting the data, but I 
would be suspicious of variance estimates and particularly of any p-values.  
The 
bootstrap could help that.
   
        Terry T.
         



--- End Message ---
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to