Good point, I actually thought about doing some kind of sampling
before, but now I think I don't have a choice. Essentially, what I am
doing is calculating possible asset allocation possibilities, e.g.

N is the number of available assets and M is the available buckets of
money to spend on the assets. With N = 3 and M = 2, I am saying I have
a choice to buy any of 3 three assets and I can afford to make 2 such
purchases. These combinations are represented below:

        M1      M2
[1,]    1       1
[2,]    1       2
[3,]    1       3
[4,]    2       2
[5,]    2       3
[6,]    3       3

[1,] is saying I spend all of my money buying asset 1.

this produces the following asset allocations

         A1     A2      A3
[1,]    1       0       0       
[2,]    .5      .5      0
[3,]    .5      0       .5
[4,]    0       1       0
[5,]    0       .5      .5
[6,]    0       0       1

[1,] again, is saying that my allocation is 100% asset 1.

from here, I plan to run some risk/performance metrics on the
allocations and then come up with a list of the best allocation
choices.

The sampling will come in handy to give me random asset allocations.
I've taken a statistical design of experiments class, so I am familiar
with generating factorial experiment designs.

So, how would I go about producing the random samples? And what # of
combinations should I use as the cutoff for doing a sampling instead
of testing every possible combination?

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 6:48 PM, G. Jay Kerns <gke...@ysu.edu> wrote:
> Dear Reuben,
>
> [snip]
>
>> my questions now are... how would I generalize functions 3 and 4 for m
>> And, which of the 4 functions would be best for varying ranges of
>> n and m? I am expecting values for n to range between 1 and 1e3, while
>> m will range between 1 and 1e6.
>>
>> Reuben
>>
>
> Regarding your 2nd question, for the values of n and m that you
> request, the answer is "none".  The number of combinations is
> astronomically large.  To get an idea, try
>
> library(prob)
> nsamp( n, m, ordered = FALSE, replace = TRUE )
>
> for assorted values of n and m.
>
> Bearing the above in mind, it may be useful to think carefully about
> _why_ it is desired to have all possible combinations.  In some
> circumstances, it is good enough to randomly generate combinations and
> draw inferences from a sampling distribution of some sort associated
> with the problem.
>
> Good luck.
> Jay
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ***************************************************
> G. Jay Kerns, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor
> Department of Mathematics & Statistics
> Youngstown State University
> Youngstown, OH 44555-0002 USA
> Office: 1035 Cushwa Hall
> Phone: (330) 941-3310 Office (voice mail)
> -3302 Department
> -3170 FAX
> E-mail: gke...@ysu.edu
> http://www.cc.ysu.edu/~gjkerns/
>

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to