Thanks, Duncan, I agree with you in terms of doing the tests
independently. I've modified the code and updated the package at
R-forge.

As for the choice of vertical bars or points, you are free to provide
the option "type = 'h'" or "type = 'p'" in the function.

Regards,
Yihui
--
Yihui Xie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Phone: +86-(0)10-82509086 Fax: +86-(0)10-82509086
Mobile: +86-15810805877
Homepage: http://www.yihui.name
School of Statistics, Room 1037, Mingde Main Building,
Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China



On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My suggestion (and this is a matter of taste) would be to do the tests
> independently, rather than using the same dataset plus new observations each
> time.  It is hard to understand the behaviour of p-values even without
> complicating things by giving a correlated sequence of them.
>
> And this is even more a matter of taste:  I'd plot the p-values as points,
> not as vertical bars.  Showing that a p-value of 0.8 is twice as big as a
> p-value of 0.4 isn't useful for interpreting them.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
>

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to