Peter Dalgaard wrote: > Dave DeBarr wrote: >>> Did you check the md5 checksum on it? >>> >> >> Yes; it matched: 540090dd892657804d1099c54d6f770d >> >> > And it is binary identical to the Austria CRAN one. >> >>> You're the first to report it, and 2.7.2 has been out for almost a >>> month, so I think it's likely that the CRAN copy is uninfected. >>> >> >> Sounds promising. Perhaps it's a false positive from eTrust. >> >> >> > Likely. A quick Googling indicates that other programs have been > "caught" too. > This link is illuminative: > http://www.cccp-project.net/forums/index.php?topic=2897.0
(I wanted to do the same thing with R, but http://www.virustotal.com has a 20M cap on the file size.) -- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Øster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX: (+45) 35327907 ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
