Thanks, Iris.
That is what I suspected, but it wasn't clear to me from the docs.
Best,
Bert
On Sun, Jan 5, 2025 at 10:16 AM Iris Simmons <ikwsi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would use two because it does not force the evaluation of the other
> arguments in the ... list.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2025, 13:00 Bert Gunter <bgunter.4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Consider:
>>
>> f1 <- function(...){
>> one <- list(...)[['a']]
>> two <- ...elt(match('a', ...names()))
>> c(one, two)
>> }
>> ## Here "..." is an argument list with "a" somewhere in it, but in an
>> unknown position.
>>
>> > f1(b=5, a = 2, c=7)
>> [1] 2 2
>>
>> Which is better for extracting a specific named argument, one<- or
>> two<- ? Or a third alternative that is better than both?
>> Comments and critiques welcome.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bert
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide https://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide https://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
