В Wed, 8 May 2024 16:59:25 +0000 Simon Andrews <simon.andr...@babraham.ac.uk> пишет:
> The lapack libraries are: > > $ rpm -qa | grep lapack > lapack-3.9.0-10.el9.x86_64 > lapack64_-3.9.0-10.el9.x86_64 > lapack64-3.9.0-10.el9.x86_64 > lapack-devel-3.9.0-10.el9.x86_64 Thanks for this information! I figured out I needed to enable the "PowerTools/CRB" repo, installed lapack-devel from there, and now I get the same configure output and the same crash: by linking with R's built-in Rblas but and system-provided LAPACK-3.9.0. If I configure --without-lapack, i.e. use both Rblas and R-provided functions from LAPACK up to 3.12.0, the build doesn't crash. If I try to enable --with-blas=-lblas, here's what happens: configure:47862: checking whether double complex BLAS can be used configure:47946: result: no The test compares the result of the BLAS function zdotu with the manually computed vector norm for a complex vector [*]. In this case, the Fortran program thinks that the BLAS returns a zero instead of the correct answer, thus failing the test and refusing to compile with system BLAS. I think that you somehow stumbled upon a Fortran ABI incompatibility regarding passing complex numbers between the Fortran code compiled during R build and the BLAS and LAPACK provided in the PowerTools/CRB repo. I don't know what exactly is the problem, but at least --without-lapack is an easy workaround without any cost in performance. In fact, if you install openblas-devel and configure --with-blas (to replace Rblas with OpenBLAS), the double complex BLAS test will pass, the build won't crash, and you will get even better performance. -- Best regards, Ivan [*] https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2024-March/083302.html ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.