IMO) The best approach is to develop a good understanding of the individual 
processes that resulted in the observed values. The blend of those processes 
then results in the distribution of the observed values. This is seldom done, 
and often not possible to do. The alternatives depend on why you are doing 
this. 

0) Sometime the nature of the data suggest a distribution. You list integer 
values. If all observations are integer (counts for example) then Poisson may 
be appropriate. With two values then maybe the Binomial distribution. 
Continuous data might be normally distributed (Gaussian distribution). If I 
roll one six-sided die many times I will have a uniform distribution (assuming 
a fair die). I could then try the same task but roll 2 dice and add the result. 
I still have discrete values, but the shape is closer to Gaussian. The 
distribution looks more and more Gaussian as I add more dice together in each 
roll. 
 
1) Try a simulation. Draw 5 values from a normal distribution, make a 
histogram. Then do it again. Is it easy to see that both samples are from the 
same distribution? Personally, the answer is no. So increase the sample size 
until you are happy with a decision that any two draws are from the same 
distribution. For my part, at 1 million most people would not be able to detect 
any difference between the two histograms. This helps calibrate the people. How 
does your sample size compare to your choice in this exercise?

2) Given that you have sufficient data (see above), can you see the 
distribution in your data? Is that good enough?

3) Are you doing this as part of following the assumptions of statistical 
models? In such tests for normality, we tend to assume that a failure to reject 
the null hypothesis is sufficient proof that the null hypothesis is true. 
However, in most other cases we are told that a failure to reject the null 
hypothesis is not sufficient to prove the null hypothesis. You need to work 
this out, but the importance, consequences, and alternatives of testing model 
assumptions is a large body of literature with (sometimes) widely divergent 
viewpoints. 

4) There are hundreds of distributions. 
https://cran.r-project.org/web/views/Distributions.html but the common 
distributions are seen in sites like this one:  
https://www.stat.umn.edu/geyer/old/5101/rlook.html. Given so many choices, you 
can probably find one that will fit your data reasonably well. Depending on how 
many data points you have will determine the reliability of that answer. Is 
that really informative to the problem you are trying to solve? Answering "what 
distribution do these data follow?" is not usually the goal.

Regards,
Tim
 

-----Original Message-----
From: R-help <r-help-boun...@r-project.org> On Behalf Of Bert Gunter
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2023 12:00 PM
To: Bogdan Tanasa <tan...@gmail.com>
Cc: r-help <r-help@r-project.org>
Subject: Re: [R] identify the distribution of the data

[External Email]

1. This is a statistical question, which usually is inappropriate here:
this list is about R language (including packages) programming.

2. IMO (so others may disagree), your question indicates a profound 
misunderstanding of basic statistical issues. While maybe you phrased it poorly 
or I misunderstand, but "identify the type of distribution" is basically a 
meaningless query. Explaining why this is so and what may be more meaningful 
would require a deep dive into statistics. You might try referencing a basic 
statistical text and/or online tutorials. Try searching on "Goodness of fit", 
"statistical modeling" or the like.

Cheers,
Bert

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 8:35 AM Bogdan Tanasa <tan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I do have dataframes with numerical values such as 1,9, 20, 51, 100 
> etc
>
> Which way do you recommend to use in order to identify the type of the 
> distribution of the data (normal, poisson, bernoulli, exponential, 
> log-normal etc ..)
>
> Thanks so much,
>
> Bogdan
>
>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstat
> .ethz.ch%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fr-help&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%40ufl.edu
> %7Cfe002d446d0d4d722f1408db09f5e78f%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a62331e1b84
> %7C0%7C0%7C638114724007457767%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAw
> MDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sda
> ta=GrZd0ZRFfnvbXzZKvJy7XUkRN4IsJOykuN5xTliR4sY%3D&reserved=0
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.r
> -project.org%2Fposting-guide.html&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%40ufl.edu%7Cfe
> 002d446d0d4d722f1408db09f5e78f%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a62331e1b84%7C0%
> 7C0%7C638114724007457767%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiL
> CJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Fz
> GMCrWD2aA2zBxcAKXQQEcbD1%2FILkTPB3jjCypcIfI%3D&reserved=0
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstat.ethz.ch%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fr-help&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%40ufl.edu%7Cfe002d446d0d4d722f1408db09f5e78f%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a62331e1b84%7C0%7C0%7C638114724007457767%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=GrZd0ZRFfnvbXzZKvJy7XUkRN4IsJOykuN5xTliR4sY%3D&reserved=0
PLEASE do read the posting guide 
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.r-project.org%2Fposting-guide.html&data=05%7C01%7Ctebert%40ufl.edu%7Cfe002d446d0d4d722f1408db09f5e78f%7C0d4da0f84a314d76ace60a62331e1b84%7C0%7C0%7C638114724007457767%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FzGMCrWD2aA2zBxcAKXQQEcbD1%2FILkTPB3jjCypcIfI%3D&reserved=0
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to