On Wed, 1 Sep 2021, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
You have missed the point. The issue is not the temporal distance, but the fact that the data you have are NOT the raw instrumental data and are NOT subject to the limitations of the recording instruments. The data you get from the USGS is not the raw instrumental value, and there is no longer any good reason for there to be any gaps in it. Indeed, the Rogue River data I looked at explicitly includes some flows labelled "Ae" meaning that they are NOT the instrumental data at all, but estimated.
Richard, Thanks for your comments. Regards, Rich ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
