On 22/05/2021 8:26 p.m., Jeff Newmiller wrote:
What is the precedence of the new |> pipe operator? I don't see it mentioned in
?Syntax, nor does it come up when I search the R Language Definition document.
It's the same precedence as the %any% operators listed in the ?Syntax
table, so it matches the magrittr pipe priority. You can see this in
the source if you know how to read Bison, or determine it experimentally:
> 2 * 3 |> print()
[1] 3
[1] 6
This is the same result as
2 * ( 3 |> print() )
so it has higher priority than * .
On the other hand,
> 2 : 3 |> print()
[1] 2 3
is the same as
( 2 : 3 ) |> print()
so it has lower priority than : .
A difference with the magrittr operator is in debugging. If an error
happens in the middle of a pipe, I find the traceback a little easier to
understand with the built-in pipe:
> 2 |> print() |> stop() |> mean()
[1] 2
Error in mean(stop(print(2))) : 2
> traceback()
2: stop(print(2))
1: mean(stop(print(2)))
versus
> 2 %>% print() %>% stop() %>% mean()
[1] 2
Error in mean(.) : 2
> traceback()
3: stop(.)
2: mean(.)
1: 2 %>% print() %>% stop() %>% mean()
Duncan Murdoch
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
