On 23/12/2020 1:52 p.m., Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Joshua,
there may be some cultural differences in play, some people are direct,
some don't like the American passive aggressiveness, and then English
may not be the first language of a poster.
A package may be a bit outdated, or not. If so, it in itself means
nothing other than that it is a bit outdated. Even if it is free of
bugs, and do what it is supposed to do, fast.
I think it is legitimate to ask here for alternatives.
Yes, but asking in a way that doesn't antagonize the experts in the
field is probably a good strategy. For example, "I want to do X, and
haven't been able to find a way to do it in packages A, B or C. Did I
miss something, or is there another package that might be able to do that?"
Duncan Murdoch
el
On 2020-12-23 20:06 , Joshua Ulrich wrote:
Hi Ben,
It's not very polite to call people's work "outdated", especially when
given to you for free. Those packages have been around and stable
for the better part of a decade, will remain stable, are actively
maintained, and all work well together to form a comprehensive suite
of tools for financial analysis.
Best,
Josh
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 11:58 AM Ben van den Anker via R-help
<r-help@r-project.org> wrote:
Hello everyone,
Could anyonre recommend some good resources for finance applications
in R? I find the packages quantmod, TTR and PerformanceAnalytics a
bit outdated. There must be something more recent on the market. Any
suggestions will be much appreciated!
Cheers,
Ben van den Anker
[...]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
